Medical Peer Review -- The Semmelweis Society

HOME

Doctors
Lawyers
Comments
Debates
Government Medicine

Central Economic Planning (State Capitalism is Monopoly) worked so well in the Soviet Union that we just had to adopt it here.
 
Legal Citations
 
Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 150 (1950) (Federal Tort Claims Act is not a waiver of sovereign immunity when service member's injuries "arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service");

-- Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 305 (1983) ("enlisted military personnel may not maintain a suit to recover damages from a superior officer for constitutional violations");

--United States v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 681 (1987) (service members can't bring tort suits against the government for injuries that are incident to military service);

--United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669, 684 (1987) ("no Bivens remedy is available for injuries that 'arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service'"); and -- their many and varied progeny. See, e.g., Verma v. United States, 19 F.3d 646

(D.C. Cir. 1994) (per curiam) (irrespective of whether a case implicates the rationales for the Feres doctrine, the doctrine bars a damage suit against the government for injuries incident to military service); Bois v. Marsh, 801F.2d 462, 471 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (in military cases, Feres applies to intentional as well as negligent torts).

8. In addition, a military doctor should not (unless he or she wins the lottery ) waste money on a civil RICO suit against the military and military superiors.

Click here.

Why do doctors love military medicine so much they leave it as soon as they can? These comments apply to working in any for-profit organization. That's right, your government has contracted for profit, for someone else's profit(other than the taxpayers' profit) in your name, and has called it 'free enterprise'. Such a deal.

QUOTATION OF THE DAY
We have to give Tom Ridge a real job. Never has a person been given so much responsibility with so little authority."
REPRESENTATIVE JANE HARMAN, who wants to expand the power of the Office of Homeland Security.

Trust me. I'm from the government.

According to this retired officer, Tri-Care pays so little that it is useless.

By failing to pay the going rate, the government guarantees that its 'covered beneficiaries' are unwelcome and underserved. A 2-tier system is perpetuated.

Section 1034

April 07, 2002    
February 2001

Letters To The Editor -


Military Physicians Leave For A Plethora Of Reasons

I have been reading several of the articles in your publication concerning military physician retention. I have recent experience with military medicine and find much of what has been written very accurate.

I do wish to add some things:
During my four year stint in the military I did not witness one single physician with the rank of O-4 or below remain in the military beyond their initial obligation for HPSP or USUHS. Thus, from what I have seen, military physician retention at the rank of O-4 and below is zero. This goes for all specialties across the board.

The only physicians I have seen stay are those in ranks of O-5 and above who seem "stuck" in the system for whatever reason. But, they are certainly in the minority and are mostly in administrative non-clinical jobs.

This all combines to produce a practicing military medical corps that is consistently youthful and relatively inexperienced.

Why this severe military physician retention problem? Obviously, the military is not a good place to practice medicine. Here are some contributing factors:

  1. Low Pay and Difficult Working Conditions. Why continue to work for the federal government, [which] is consistently demanding more and more from physicians, when one can go to the private sector and still work as hard but be much better compensated for it?
    This is true for all specialties and is a "no-brainer."

  2. Inadequate Retirement Plan. The retirement plan is not a good deal for physicians. This is because it is based upon "base pay" only, and is not based upon the total income.

  3. Too much Managed Care. The military now seems to have a love affair with managed care, and has forced it upon its physicians. Unless one shares this passion for managed care, practicing medicine in the military, especially as a "PCM," is demanding, difficult and frustrating.
    This is mainly because one does not have the autonomy to limit the amount of HMO patients in his or her practice. Military medicine (in the MTF) is now 100 per cent HMO.
    One primary care physician who recently left the military described the experience as "hellish" because of this. This leads to the next reason.

  4. Lack of Autonomy. All physicians place a high degree of value upon this, whether they are willing to admit it or not. Most, if not all, physicians are strong-willed, independent people or they would not have the "right stuff" to get into and through the rigors of medical school and residency. (If the military allowed them a residencywhich is a whole other problem.)
    Military physicians, simply because of the organization they are in, have less autonomy than any others. Granted, this is given up when one chooses to "sign on the dotted line" and accept money from the government for medical education. But as soon as freedom can be regained, most take advantage of the opportunity.
    However just because one "belongs" to the military does not mean that there needs to be as much micromanagement of military medical practice that there now seems to be. This micromanagement is a direct result of total "managed care."

  5. Loss of Traditional, "Old-Fashioned" Medical Values. Military medicine now seems to be concerned more with numbers such as "metrics" and "productivity." Whatever happened to the patient?
    The patient seems to have become lost in all this. In fact, the patient no longer exists at all; this is evidenced by the fact that the patient has become a "customer."
    Pardon me, but a "customer" is someone who buys a hamburger from McDonalds. A "patient" is someone who seeks the help of a physician. But wait, the physician has been lost also, the physician no longer exists either but is now a "provider." So, we have "customers" "accessing" "providers." This doesnt sound like medicine at all. Sounds more like business doesnt it?
    So, there we have it folks, military medicine is now all about business. What is business all about? MONEY. So, what is military medicine all about now? MONEY.
    Yes, private practice is about earning money also, but it is not the prime focus. Believe it or not, most physicians I know did go to medical school because they wanted to help people. People are what is most important in their lives, not making money. On the other hand, the prime focus of military healthcare as a whole now seems to be centered around money.
    What does this have to do with physician retention? Practicing medicine in such an overly cost-conscious environment is often very difficult and frustrating because of the limitations that are imposed in an effort to preserve that which is valued the most: money.
    What limitations? Limited pharmacy formularies, strict referral criteria, and the many other limitations imposed by managed care.

  6. Career Progression Leads Out of Clinical Medicine. In the military, achieving higher rank (and thus higher pay), almost certainly means leaving the practice of medicine for a "desk job." This is a good thing for physicians who dont want to practice medicine anymore, for whatever reason. But for most who want to continue the full time practice of medicine AND experience career progression, there is only one direction to go: out.

  7. Promotion Dependent upon Unnecessary Non-Applicable Professional Military Education. In the military, physicians cannot be promoted beyond the rank of O-4 without "Professional Military Education." This "PME" is not geared toward medical officers in any way shape or form, but rather is totally oriented toward line officers. For a physician who wants to become a line officer, this is probably a necessary thing, but how many of those are there?
    Furthermore, I doubt we will ever see a medical officer in command of a line organization.

  8. Little or No Professional Development. The military continues to deny medical school graduates the opportunity to obtain a seamless medical education from medical school through residency before entering practice.
    The military has come under congressional heat for this and deserves every bit of it. Hopefully, Congress will keep the pressure on to put an end to this archaic practice. No need is so great as to justify this.
    All too often, these unfortunate physicians must serve out their entire time with incomplete medical training, because the military then refuses to provide them with the additional education they need and ask for, or they are so disillusioned and disappointed with their military medical experience (after what has happened to them) that they just want to get it behind them. This goes for GMOs and GMO-flight surgeons.
    Speaking of GMO-flight surgeons, isnt it baffling that its pilotsamong the militarys most valuable human assetsare being cared for by its least trained physicians? Go figure.
This list is by no means exhaustive. I could go on and on, but I think most would agree that I have hit the big ones.
Will anything be done to correct all this and thus the physician retention problems? Its anybodys guess.
But, I wouldnt hold my breath.

NAME WITHELD

Back to the article list
Other Articles from February 2001:

             

Enter supporting content here